Get Ready for Software-Defined Networking in the Enterprise
Though originating in academic exercises and graduating from proof-of-concept testing labs to initial adoption by Web-scale giants, carriers, service providers and telecom operators, software-defined networking (SDN) is heading for the enterprise.
Industry observers say you can pretty much count on it.
To help you get ready, here's a primer on what SDN is, what benefits it provides and exactly who is providing those benefits -- and how.
First off is the definition. That's hard enough with such a nascent technology, still shaking itself out in a hodgepodge of would-be standards bearers, commercial stewards with different approaches and agendas, and various open source projects.
To help cut through the commercial bias, let's start off with the vendor-agnostic Open Networking Foundation (ONF), "a user-driven organization dedicated to the promotion and adoption of SDN through open standards development."
It says SDN is "the physical separation of the network control plane from the forwarding plane, and where a control plane controls several devices." Furthermore, it's "an emerging architecture that is dynamic, manageable, cost-effective and adaptable, making it ideal for the high-bandwidth, dynamic nature of today's applications."
With that separation of network planes, network "intelligence" is moved from proprietary hardware to the control plane, managed by a software controller that sees the entire network like one single entity that it can control as needed.
Say Goodbye to Proprietary
And with that de-emphasis of hardware, another key tenet of SDN emerges: the replacement of high-functioning, proprietary hardware with less-expensive, commodity white-box (or bare-metal) switches that route traffic as they're told.
In a nutshell SDN provides increased network agility, abstraction, automation, orchestration/control and visibility.
So there's your "what" and "why." Now for "who."
When you think of networking, you think of Cisco Systems Inc. When you think of network virtualization, you think of VMware Inc. Both companies avoid heavy use of the term SDN in their product marketing, while providing products that the rest of the world sees firmly ensconced in the SDN camp. While several open source SDN solutions are available from organizations such as the ONF, along with a host of proprietary offerings from numerous second-tier vendors, we'll focus on Cisco and VMware here.
Cisco, as the propriety networking kingpin, is in the most danger of SDN disruption, according to various analysts, experts and industry pundits.
Recognizing the threat, Cisco had some fits and starts in its reaction to SDN, such as the Open Network Environment (ONE) introduced in 2012. Since then, it has consolidated that product's "application-led" philosophy and released Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI), which it has described as being "better than SDN." The company says it "reduces TCO, automates IT tasks, and accelerates datacenter application deployments. It accomplishes this using a business-relevant SDN policy model across networks, servers, storage, security and services."
It still uses proprietary components, however, such as the Nexus 9000 switches and its own Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) -- as opposed to open source controller alternatives such as the OpenDaylight project.
Cisco is hedging its bets, though, and participates in the OpenDaylight project and other SDN-related industry initiatives, such as the Open Network Operating System (ONOS).
Coincidentally, another OpenDaylight member is VMware, an SDN competitor which Cisco has vowed to "crush" in the marketplace.
VMware positions its networking virtualization platform, NSX, as a component of the software-defined datacenter. "In contrast to SDN, in which hardware remains the driving force, VMware network virtualization technology truly decouples network resources from underlying hardware," the company says.
NSX is described by VMware as "a hypervisor networking solution designed to manage, automate and provide basic Layer 4-7 services to virtual machine traffic." VMware developed the NSX overlay approach through its 2012 acquisition of Nicera Inc. in 2012.
"ACI and NSX provide very different approaches to solving networking challenges," said Gartner analyst Andrew Lerner in a blog post last month. "ACI is a programmable Ethernet Fabric that integrates hardware and software, while NSX is a network overlay."
Other options abound, of course, but conservative enterprises may be inclined to pick one of the two industry leaders for help in their forays into SDN.
"Choosing between ACI and NSX is a strategic network decision, and is way beyond just a networking thing," Lerner said.
We'll save that discussion for a later time.
David Ramel is an editor and writer for 1105 Media.